Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Meta

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Meta

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (91.1%), DocVQA (88.4%), ChartQA (83.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Mistral AI

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Mistral AI

Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). The model shows particular specialization in reasoning tasks with an average performance of 80.2%. It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.

Mistral AI

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Mistral AI

2024-07-18

Meta

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Meta

2024-09-25

2 months newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Meta

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

$0.20 cheaper
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.05
Mistral AI

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Meta

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Max Context:256.0K
Parameters:10.6B
Mistral AI

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Max Context:256.0K
Parameters:12.0B

Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Meta

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

+5.0%
Average Score:73.0%
Mistral AI

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Average Score:68.0%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Meta

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

general
+9.3%
70.1%
Mistral AI

Mistral NeMo Instruct

general
60.8%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

2023-12-31

More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Meta

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

6 providers

Sambanova

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Together

Throughput: 168 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 108 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 125 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms

Groq

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Mistral AI

Mistral NeMo Instruct

2 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Mistral AI

Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Meta

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

+5.0%
Avg Score:73.0%
Providers:6
Mistral AI

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Avg Score:68.0%
Providers:2