Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Meta

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Meta

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). The model shows particular specialization in code tasks with an average performance of 89.4%. It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Meta

2024-07-23

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta

2024-12-06

4 months newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Meta

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Meta

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Max Context:256.0K
Parameters:70.0B
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Max Context:256.0K
Parameters:70.0B

Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Meta

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Average Score:71.9%
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

+5.2%
Average Score:77.2%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Meta

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

code
76.3%
math
83.3%
general
68.7%
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

code
+13.1%
89.4%
math
+0.7%
84.0%
general
+2.0%
70.7%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Meta

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

9 providers

Sambanova

Throughput: 74 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Together

Throughput: 94 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Hyperbolic

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 25 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 32 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Groq

Throughput: 250 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Lambda

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Cerebras

Throughput: 1204 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

9 providers

Sambanova

Throughput: 1096 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Together

Throughput: 65 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Hyperbolic

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 197 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Groq

Throughput: 268 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Lambda

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Cerebras

Throughput: 2220 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Meta

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Avg Score:71.9%
Providers:9
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

+5.2%
Avg Score:77.2%
Providers:9