Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Google

Gemma 3 27B

Google

Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). The model shows particular specialization in math tasks with an average performance of 78.2%. It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.3% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (92.3%), DocVQA (90.1%), MGSM (86.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Meta

2024-09-25

Google

Gemma 3 27B

Google

2025-03-12

5 months newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Google

Gemma 3 27B

$0.45 cheaper
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Google

Gemma 3 27B

Larger context
Max Context:262.1K
Parameters:27.0B
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Max Context:256.0K
Parameters:90.0B

Average performance across 6 common benchmarks

Google

Gemma 3 27B

Average Score:74.3%
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

+1.8%
Average Score:76.0%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Google

Gemma 3 27B

math
+7.5%
78.2%
general
53.5%
vision
+2.2%
71.6%
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

math
70.7%
general
+19.9%
73.5%
vision
69.4%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Google

Gemma 3 27B

2 providers

DeepInfra

Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms

Novita

Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

5 providers

Together

Throughput: 57 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Hyperbolic

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 24 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Google

Gemma 3 27B

Avg Score:74.3%
Providers:2
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

+1.8%
Avg Score:76.0%
Providers:5