Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Google

Gemma 3 12B

Google

Gemma 3 12B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.8% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (94.4%), IFEval (88.9%), DocVQA (87.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Meta

Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). The model shows particular specialization in vision tasks with an average performance of 81.9%. With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Google

Gemma 3 12B

Google

2025-03-12

Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Meta

2025-04-05

24 days newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Google

Gemma 3 12B

$0.23 cheaper
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Google

Gemma 3 12B

Max Context:262.1K
Parameters:12.0B
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Larger context
Max Context:20.0M
Parameters:109.0B

Average performance across 7 common benchmarks

Google

Gemma 3 12B

Average Score:63.7%
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

+2.8%
Average Score:66.5%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Google

Gemma 3 12B

vision
70.2%
math
+3.4%
73.9%
code
+20.2%
70.5%
general
53.2%
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

vision
+11.7%
81.9%
math
70.5%
code
50.3%
general
+13.1%
66.3%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Google

Gemma 3 12B

1 providers

DeepInfra

Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

6 providers

Together

Throughput: 106.9 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 76.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.31ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 116.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms

Groq

Throughput: 776.1 tok/s
Latency: 1.08ms

Novita

Throughput: 69.82 tok/s
Latency: 0.85ms

Lambda

Throughput: 139.7 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
Google

Gemma 3 12B

Avg Score:63.7%
Providers:1
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

+2.8%
Avg Score:66.5%
Providers:6