Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (86.5%), TAU-bench Retail (80.5%), GPQA (75.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Meta

Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). The model shows particular specialization in vision tasks with an average performance of 81.9%. With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Meta

2025-04-05

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic

2025-05-22

1 month newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

$17.62 cheaper
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Max Context:328.0K
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Larger context
Max Context:20.0M
Parameters:109.0B

Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

+11.6%
Average Score:74.9%
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Average Score:63.3%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

vision
74.4%
general
+1.8%
68.1%
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

vision
+7.5%
81.9%
general
66.3%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

3 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Anthropic

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

6 providers

Together

Throughput: 106.9 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 76.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.31ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 116.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms

Groq

Throughput: 776.1 tok/s
Latency: 1.08ms

Novita

Throughput: 69.82 tok/s
Latency: 0.85ms

Lambda

Throughput: 139.7 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

+11.6%
Avg Score:74.9%
Providers:3
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Avg Score:63.3%
Providers:6