Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (86.5%), TAU-bench Retail (80.5%), GPQA (75.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta

Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (92.3%), ChartQA (90.0%). The model shows particular specialization in vision tasks with an average performance of 75.8%. With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 7 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta

2025-04-05

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic

2025-05-22

1 month newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

$17.23 cheaper
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Max Context:328.0K
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Larger context
Max Context:2.0M
Parameters:400.0B

Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

+3.3%
Average Score:74.9%
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Average Score:71.6%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

vision
74.4%
general
68.1%
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

vision
+1.4%
75.8%
general
+3.4%
71.5%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

3 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Anthropic

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

7 providers

Sambanova

Throughput: 638.7 tok/s
Latency: 2.04ms

Together

Throughput: 97.93 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 83.59 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 63.03 tok/s
Latency: 0.62ms

Groq

Throughput: 307.3 tok/s
Latency: 0.27ms

Novita

Throughput: 69.42 tok/s
Latency: 0.62ms

Lambda

Throughput: 93.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

+3.3%
Avg Score:74.9%
Providers:3
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Avg Score:71.6%
Providers:7