Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (86.5%), TAU-bench Retail (80.5%), GPQA (75.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.1% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MRCR (93.0%), AIME 2024 (92.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (88.6%). The model shows particular specialization in vision tasks with an average performance of 82.2%. With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.

Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google

2025-05-20

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic

2025-05-22

2 days newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

$6.75 cheaper
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Max Context:328.0K
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Larger context
Max Context:1.1M

Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Average Score:73.3%
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

+4.0%
Average Score:77.2%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

vision
74.4%
general
68.1%
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

vision
+7.8%
82.2%
general
+1.3%
69.4%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro

2025-01-31

More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

3 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Anthropic

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

1 providers

Google

Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4

Avg Score:73.3%
Providers:3
Google

Gemini 2.5 Pro

+4.0%
Avg Score:77.2%
Providers:1