Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Google

2025-05-20

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

Anthropic

2025-05-22

2 days newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

$87.20 cheaper
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

Max Context:328.0K
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Larger context
Max Context:1.1M

Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

+4.1%
Average Score:75.9%
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Average Score:71.7%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

vision
76.5%
general
+13.1%
71.1%
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

vision
+3.2%
79.7%
general
58.0%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash

2025-01-31

More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

3 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Anthropic

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

2 providers

Google

Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms

ZeroEval

Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4

+4.1%
Avg Score:75.9%
Providers:3
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Avg Score:71.7%
Providers:2