Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (98.4%), AIME 2025 (80.2%), MMMU (validation) (64.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Microsoft

Phi 4 Reasoning

Microsoft

Phi 4 Reasoning is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.7%), HumanEval+ (92.9%), IFEval (83.4%). The model shows particular specialization in code tasks with an average performance of 76.7%. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.

Microsoft

Phi 4 Reasoning

Microsoft

2025-04-30

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic

2025-08-05

3 months newer

Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Average Score:42.8%
Microsoft

Phi 4 Reasoning

+21.6%
Average Score:64.3%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

general
44.6%
Microsoft

Phi 4 Reasoning

general
+29.7%
74.3%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison

Phi 4 Reasoning

2025-03-01

More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

0 providers
Microsoft

Phi 4 Reasoning

0 providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Avg Score:42.8%
Providers:0
Microsoft

Phi 4 Reasoning

+21.6%
Avg Score:64.3%
Providers:0