Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (98.4%), AIME 2025 (80.2%), MMMU (validation) (64.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is a language model developed by DeepSeek. The model shows competitive results across 4 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (83.9%), AIME 2024 (52.7%), GPQA (33.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

DeepSeek

2025-01-20

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic

2025-08-05

6 months newer

Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Average Score:5.3%
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

+28.5%
Average Score:33.8%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

general
+1.3%
44.6%
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

general
43.3%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

0 providers
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

0 providers
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Avg Score:5.3%
Providers:0
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

+28.5%
Avg Score:33.8%
Providers:0
Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B - AI Model Comparison | The AI Forger