Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (89.2%), GSM8k (88.9%), HellaSwag (85.9%). The model shows particular specialization in reasoning tasks with an average performance of 87.5%. It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta

Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (92.3%), ChartQA (90.0%). The model shows particular specialization in vision tasks with an average performance of 75.8%. With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 7 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Anthropic

2024-03-13

Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Meta

2025-04-05

1 year newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

$0.73 cheaper
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Max Context:400.0K
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

Larger context
Max Context:2.0M
Parameters:400.0B

Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Average Score:55.6%
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

+21.6%
Average Score:77.2%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

code
+15.4%
75.9%
math
67.6%
general
65.1%
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

code
60.5%
math
+8.1%
75.7%
general
+6.4%
71.5%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

3 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Anthropic

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

7 providers

Sambanova

Throughput: 638.7 tok/s
Latency: 2.04ms

Together

Throughput: 97.93 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 83.59 tok/s
Latency: 0.38ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 63.03 tok/s
Latency: 0.62ms

Groq

Throughput: 307.3 tok/s
Latency: 0.27ms

Novita

Throughput: 69.42 tok/s
Latency: 0.62ms

Lambda

Throughput: 93.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Avg Score:55.6%
Providers:3
Meta

Llama 4 Maverick

+21.6%
Avg Score:77.2%
Providers:7