Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (89.2%), GSM8k (88.9%), HellaSwag (85.9%). The model shows particular specialization in reasoning tasks with an average performance of 87.5%. It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). The model shows particular specialization in code tasks with an average performance of 89.4%. It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Anthropic

2024-03-13

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta

2024-12-06

8 months newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$1.10 cheaper
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Larger context
Max Context:400.0K
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Max Context:256.0K
Parameters:70.0B

Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Average Score:59.7%
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

+18.9%
Average Score:78.6%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

code
75.9%
math
67.6%
general
65.1%
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

code
+13.5%
89.4%
math
+16.4%
84.0%
general
+5.5%
70.7%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

3 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Anthropic

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

9 providers

Sambanova

Throughput: 1096 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Together

Throughput: 65 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Hyperbolic

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 197 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Groq

Throughput: 268 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Lambda

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Cerebras

Throughput: 2220 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Avg Score:59.7%
Providers:3
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

+18.9%
Avg Score:78.6%
Providers:9