Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.5% across 10 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (89.2%), GSM8k (88.9%), HellaSwag (85.9%). The model shows particular specialization in reasoning tasks with an average performance of 87.5%. It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Anthropic

2024-03-13

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Google

2025-06-17

1 year newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Input:$0.25
Output:$1.25
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

$1.00 cheaper
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Max Context:400.0K
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Larger context
Max Context:1.1M

Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Average Score:33.3%
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

+31.3%
Average Score:64.6%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

reasoning
+85.0%
87.5%
code
+33.4%
75.9%
general
+29.4%
65.1%
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

reasoning
2.5%
code
42.5%
general
35.8%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

2025-01-01

More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

3 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Anthropic

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

1 providers

Google

Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
Anthropic

Claude 3 Haiku

Avg Score:33.3%
Providers:3
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

+31.3%
Avg Score:64.6%
Providers:1