Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.1% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), IFEval (93.2%), MMMLU (86.1%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Meta

Llama 4 Scout is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.3% across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (90.6%), ChartQA (88.8%). The model shows particular specialization in vision tasks with an average performance of 81.9%. With a 20.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Anthropic

2025-02-24

Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Meta

2025-04-05

1 month newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

$17.62 cheaper
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Max Context:328.0K
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Larger context
Max Context:20.0M
Parameters:109.0B

Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

+16.6%
Average Score:79.9%
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Average Score:63.3%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

math
+25.7%
96.2%
code
+42.9%
93.2%
vision
75.0%
general
+2.3%
68.5%
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

math
70.5%
code
50.3%
vision
+6.9%
81.9%
general
66.3%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

4 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Anthropic

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

ZeroEval

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

6 providers

Together

Throughput: 106.9 tok/s
Latency: 0.54ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 76.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.31ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 116.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.53ms

Groq

Throughput: 776.1 tok/s
Latency: 1.08ms

Novita

Throughput: 69.82 tok/s
Latency: 0.85ms

Lambda

Throughput: 139.7 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
Anthropic

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

+16.6%
Avg Score:79.9%
Providers:4
Meta

Llama 4 Scout

Avg Score:63.3%
Providers:6