Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (96.4%), DocVQA (95.2%), AI2D (94.7%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.3% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (92.3%), DocVQA (90.1%), MGSM (86.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Meta

2024-09-25

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic

2024-10-22

27 days newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

$17.25 cheaper
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Larger context
Max Context:400.0K
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Max Context:256.0K
Parameters:90.0B

Average performance across 9 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

+7.9%
Average Score:82.7%
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Average Score:74.8%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

math
+12.8%
83.5%
vision
+12.3%
81.8%
general
68.7%
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

math
70.7%
vision
69.4%
general
+4.8%
73.5%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

3 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Anthropic

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

5 providers

Together

Throughput: 57 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Hyperbolic

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 24 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 50 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

+7.9%
Avg Score:82.7%
Providers:3
Meta

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Avg Score:74.8%
Providers:5
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct - AI Model Comparison | The AI Forger