Model Comparison

Comprehensive side-by-side analysis of model capabilities and performance

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku is a language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.1%), MGSM (85.6%), DROP (83.1%). It supports a 400K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). The model shows particular specialization in code tasks with an average performance of 89.4%. It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

2024-10-22

Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Meta

2024-12-06

1 month newer

Pricing Comparison

Cost per million tokens (USD)

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input:$0.80
Output:$4.00
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

$4.40 cheaper
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20

Performance Metrics

Context window and performance specifications

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Larger context
Max Context:400.0K
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Max Context:256.0K
Parameters:70.0B

Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Average Score:69.9%
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

+5.2%
Average Score:75.2%

Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

code
88.1%
math
77.5%
general
57.6%
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

code
+1.3%
89.4%
math
+6.6%
84.0%
general
+13.1%
70.7%
Benchmark Scores - Detailed View
Side-by-side comparison of all benchmark scores

Provider Availability & Performance

Available providers and their performance metrics

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

3 providers

Google

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 104 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Anthropic

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.3ms
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

9 providers

Sambanova

Throughput: 1096 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Together

Throughput: 65 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Hyperbolic

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

DeepInfra

Throughput: 37 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Fireworks

Throughput: 197 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Groq

Throughput: 268 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Bedrock

Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms

Lambda

Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms

Cerebras

Throughput: 2220 tok/s
Latency: 0.65ms
Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Avg Score:69.9%
Providers:3
Meta

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

+5.2%
Avg Score:75.2%
Providers:9